Comments on: C# Generics and anonymous methods http://www.svendtofte.com/csharp/c-generics-and-anonymous-methods/ rantings & scraps on code and web development Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:58:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Oleg Kosenkov http://www.svendtofte.com/csharp/c-generics-and-anonymous-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-127 Oleg Kosenkov Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:18:17 +0000 http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=155#comment-127 Surprisingly, nothing was sad about the StringBuilder class which may handle the string concatenations in a more optimal way. I have not looked under the hood of the framework but i hope the suggested functional lambda version does it optimally. Surprisingly, nothing was sad about the StringBuilder class which may handle the string concatenations in a more optimal way. I have not looked under the hood of the framework but i hope the suggested functional lambda version does it optimally.

]]> By: Jason Bunting http://www.svendtofte.com/csharp/c-generics-and-anonymous-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-102 Jason Bunting Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:55:11 +0000 http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=155#comment-102 Your last example there can be shorted even further to this: s = string.Join(" OR ", gs.ConvertAll( g => string.Format("Id='{0}'", g) ).ToArray() ); The part in yours where you do the "new Converter" is inferred by the compiler, so it is really unnecessary. Also, you don't have to explicitly call ToString() on g, since string.Format will do that internally regardless. Your last example there can be shorted even further to this:

s = string.Join(” OR “,
gs.ConvertAll(
g => string.Format(“Id=’{0}’”, g)
).ToArray()
);

The part in yours where you do the “new Converter” is inferred by the compiler, so it is really unnecessary. Also, you don’t have to explicitly call ToString() on g, since string.Format will do that internally regardless.

]]>