<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on max-width</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/</link>
	<description>rantings &#38; scraps on code and web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max-width in Internet Explorer &#124; Welt des Wissens</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Max-width in Internet Explorer &#124; Welt des Wissens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-397</guid>
		<description>[...] Juli 2008. Ich habe  ein Update zu dieser Seite , wie ich fand es war noch rund um die Web verbunden. Wenn Sie beabsichtigen, zu verwenden, was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Juli 2008. Ich habe  ein Update zu dieser Seite , wie ich fand es war noch rund um die Web verbunden. Wenn Sie beabsichtigen, zu verwenden, was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts about IE and Max-width &#171; NCSizer.WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts about IE and Max-width &#171; NCSizer.WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-383</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, IE7 (largely) solved the problem regarding its usefulness when MS integrated into IE7, as long as you used a proper DOCTYPE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, IE7 (largely) solved the problem regarding its usefulness when MS integrated into IE7, as long as you used a proper DOCTYPE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 外遇</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>外遇</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I appreciate seeing sites that comprehend the worth of providing a prime useful resource,his help to make this website worth coming back to for even more info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate seeing sites that comprehend the worth of providing a prime useful resource,his help to make this website worth coming back to for even more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Min-width, max-width, min-height y max-height también en IE &#8211; Blog &#8211; David Barredo</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Min-width, max-width, min-height y max-height también en IE &#8211; Blog &#8211; David Barredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-168</guid>
		<description>[...] Reflections on max-width, ie7.js y LibrosWeb.   Archivado en: CSSSin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reflections on max-width, ie7.js y LibrosWeb.   Archivado en: CSSSin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-145</guid>
		<description>You should probably fix the typo &quot;Dead Edwards.&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should probably fix the typo &#8220;Dead Edwards.&#8221; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitte Website bewerten [Editor] - html.de Forum - HTML f</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitte Website bewerten [Editor] - html.de Forum - HTML f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] gemacht wird). Svend Tofte l</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gemacht wird). Svend Tofte l</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitte Website bewerten [Editor] - html.de Forum - HTML f</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitte Website bewerten [Editor] - html.de Forum - HTML f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] gemacht wird). Svend Tofte l</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gemacht wird). Svend Tofte l</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "boxmodel" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "boxmodel" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] boxmodel   Straight-up Topsider Aluminum Truck Tool Box - Model 4 Saved by soho on Mon 08-12-2008   Reflections on max-width Saved by Teknomanscythe on Mon 01-12-2008   Box Model - dimensions, padding, margin and borders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] boxmodel   Straight-up Topsider Aluminum Truck Tool Box &#8211; Model 4 Saved by soho on Mon 08-12-2008   Reflections on max-width Saved by Teknomanscythe on Mon 01-12-2008   Box Model &#8211; dimensions, padding, margin and borders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I think to swear off browser specific hacks as &#039;arrogance&#039; is in a way the same exact rigidness the author is deploring / trying to get away from. 

For me, as a designer, it&#039;s not about accepting &#039;blemishes&#039; or not accepting blemishes. It&#039;s simply a matter of doing what I want to do. If what I want to do can&#039;t be done it can&#039;t be done, where it gets frustrating is when it can be done elegantly in any of our targeted browsers except IE6. At this point, simply constraining an entire project, and the majority of users out of a feature or experiential aspect of the site just because IE6 is a weak browser is in my mind more &#039;just stupid&#039; then feeding IE6 a special little cookie so it will play nice and doing it the right way for everyone else.

Yes, an entire site littered with browser specific hacks would be an ugly unfortunate thing. But that&#039;s an extreme. As developers as well as designers we need to be flexible. Swearing off hacks altogether is not being flexible. If an entire project can come together exactly as the designers want it to, all with one or two concessions for IE6 (the currently problem vestige of a previous age), then as an architect I say so be it. 

The web and the world isn&#039;t made up of polar extremes. It&#039;s gray area. There are times where hacks for IE6 or Safari are the best compromises of implementation and intention.  

Don&#039;t hate the player dog. Hate the game.

Seth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think to swear off browser specific hacks as &#8216;arrogance&#8217; is in a way the same exact rigidness the author is deploring / trying to get away from. </p>
<p>For me, as a designer, it&#8217;s not about accepting &#8216;blemishes&#8217; or not accepting blemishes. It&#8217;s simply a matter of doing what I want to do. If what I want to do can&#8217;t be done it can&#8217;t be done, where it gets frustrating is when it can be done elegantly in any of our targeted browsers except IE6. At this point, simply constraining an entire project, and the majority of users out of a feature or experiential aspect of the site just because IE6 is a weak browser is in my mind more &#8216;just stupid&#8217; then feeding IE6 a special little cookie so it will play nice and doing it the right way for everyone else.</p>
<p>Yes, an entire site littered with browser specific hacks would be an ugly unfortunate thing. But that&#8217;s an extreme. As developers as well as designers we need to be flexible. Swearing off hacks altogether is not being flexible. If an entire project can come together exactly as the designers want it to, all with one or two concessions for IE6 (the currently problem vestige of a previous age), then as an architect I say so be it. </p>
<p>The web and the world isn&#8217;t made up of polar extremes. It&#8217;s gray area. There are times where hacks for IE6 or Safari are the best compromises of implementation and intention.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hate the player dog. Hate the game.</p>
<p>Seth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HotPotatoe</title>
		<link>http://www.svendtofte.com/stylesheets/reflections-on-max-width/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>HotPotatoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svendtofte.com/?p=4#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Hi there, nice article and clear explanation.
I have a question fron which I haven&#039;t seen any answer yet.
I have a website done in flash 100%.
I want this website to be inside a layer and I want this layer to grow free and expand to fill the user&#039;s browser till certain point, this is: A máximun width of 1600px and a máximun heigth of 1000px. (I can live without fixing the height if necessary) The flash movie inside the div has it&#039;s size set to 100% width and heigth. If you apply this hack, or the JELLO MOLD hack, or at least every hack I have found on the Web, the content of the layer (the swf movie) wont be displayed in IE!! It just dissappear!!
It seems like because of it&#039;s relative width and height (100%) it doesn&#039;t have a solid presence to make it&#039;s container expand...
Try it yourself, you will see what I mean.
Can anybody bring me some help about this topic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, nice article and clear explanation.<br />
I have a question fron which I haven&#8217;t seen any answer yet.<br />
I have a website done in flash 100%.<br />
I want this website to be inside a layer and I want this layer to grow free and expand to fill the user&#8217;s browser till certain point, this is: A máximun width of 1600px and a máximun heigth of 1000px. (I can live without fixing the height if necessary) The flash movie inside the div has it&#8217;s size set to 100% width and heigth. If you apply this hack, or the JELLO MOLD hack, or at least every hack I have found on the Web, the content of the layer (the swf movie) wont be displayed in IE!! It just dissappear!!<br />
It seems like because of it&#8217;s relative width and height (100%) it doesn&#8217;t have a solid presence to make it&#8217;s container expand&#8230;<br />
Try it yourself, you will see what I mean.<br />
Can anybody bring me some help about this topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

